Because of the switch from physical to digital formats, music royalties have changed in big ways. It all started in the late 1990s when MP3 players and online music stores came out.
These changes caused album sales to drop significantly. Streaming services like Spotify and Apple Music have changed the way people listen to music by giving them access to huge libraries of music like never before.
However, the digital revolution has also changed how royalties are calculated and given out. Digital royalties often mean that artists get paid less per unit than they would from traditional physical sales. This has led to ongoing debates about the need for more fair pay structures in the digital age. On the contrary though, while pay per unit is less than in the physical era of decades past, streaming has expanded longevity of royalties for artists and musicians from top to bottom. Instead of relying solely on first few weeks album sales, music copyright holders now have the luxury of consistent listenership on digital streaming platforms in perpetuity where each stream will contribute to their earnings for life. This extends the lifespan of song earnings exponentially greater than in previous eras and has hence led to more recorded music revenue than ever before in recent years.
Since the music business is growing, everyone needs to know how the changes affect royalties.
History of Music Royalties
The history of music royalties is interesting because it shows how the music business has changed over time and how it has adapted to new technologies. Let's look into this history in more depth:
Early Beginnings
The first music royalties were paid out when printed sheet music became popular in the late 1400s.
Ottaviano Petrucci, a printer from Venice, came up with a way to print polyphonic music in 1473. This made it possible to make and distribute many musical scores. That new idea made it possible for music to be sold, which led to the need to protect composers' rights.
In 1777, France passed the first copyright law that specifically covered music. That same year, the Société des Auteurs et Compositeurs Dramatiques (SACD) was created to collect royalties for musical and theatrical works. This was the first official recognition that people who make music have the right to get paid for it.
The Copyright Act of 1790 in the United States was first meant to protect printed works like maps and books. But it didn't say anything directly about musical compositions.
It was "The Kentucky Volunteer" in 1820 that was the first musical piece to be registered as a book under this act. The Copyright Act of 1831 was the first law to officially recognize musical works as a separate type of work that could be protected by copyright.
Mechanical Royalties
When player pianos and piano rolls were made in the late 1800s, the idea of mechanical royalties was born. At first, companies that made piano rolls copied musical works without paying the composers, which led to lawsuits.
In 1908, the U.S. Supreme Court case White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co. was very important because it said that piano rolls were not copies of musical compositions and did not need to be paid royalties. This decision made songwriters and publishers very angry, which is what Congress did.
Because of this, the Copyright Act of 1909 was made law, which set the first statutory mechanical royalty rate in the US. This law said that companies that made piano rolls and later phonograph records had to pay the owners of the music rights two cents for every copy they made. The fact that this rate didn't change until 1978 shows how slowly royalty rates changed in the early 1900s.
Performance Royalties
With the rise of radio and public performances of music in the early 1900s, the idea of performance royalties became more popular.
The American Society of Composers, Authors, and Publishers (ASCAP) was created in 1914 to collect and share royalties from recorded music played in public.
ASCAP was created because creators of music were not getting paid enough when it was used in commercial settings. Businesses and radio stations that were used to getting music for free were against the group at first. But in the 1920s and 1930s, ASCAP won a series of court cases that made it legal for them to collect royalties for public performances.
Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) was started in 1939 as a rival to ASCAP. Its main goal was to represent songwriters in country, blues, and rock 'n' roll genres that ASCAP wasn't doing enough for. When BMI was created, there was more competition and variety in the music licensing market.
Performance Rights Organizations (PROs) like ASCAP and BMI played a key role in making sure that songwriters and publishers got paid fairly. These groups made complex systems to keep track of how music was used and pay royalties based on things like radio airplay, live performances, and, later, digital streams.
Synchronization Royalties
Synchronization royalties came about when sound was added to movies in the late 1920s. Since "The Jazz Singer" (1927), the first "talkie" film, music has been an important part of movies.
As the movie business grew, so did the need for music to go with movies.
These problems led to the creation of synchronization licenses, which let you use a piece of music in time with visual media.
In addition to movies, TV shows, commercials, and later video games also used the idea of sync royalties. Rates for sync licenses are usually negotiated case-by-case, taking into account things like how popular the music is, what kind of media it is used on, and how long it will be used.
In the 1980s and 1990s, more music supervisors were hired, which made the process of choosing and licensing music for movies and TV shows even more professional.
That gave artists more chances to earn sync royalties.
Over the years, music royalties have changed along with new technologies and ways of enjoying music. This shows how dynamic the music industry is and how hard people are working to make sure creators get paid fairly.
Transition to Digital
The move to digital formats has completely changed the music business, especially the way royalties are collected and given out. For artists, labels, and distributors, this change has brought both chances and problems.
Impact of the Digital Age
The shift from buying music in stores to downloading and streaming it online has greatly changed how people listen to music.
84% of recorded music sales in the US came from streaming in 2021, up from just 7% in 2010. Because of this change, there are new ways to figure out and pay royalties.
Digital mechanical royalties have become an important way for songwriters and publishers to make money. Digital mechanicals are different from traditional mechanical royalties because they are not tied to physical sales. Instead, they are made every time a song is downloaded or streamed.
The US's Music Modernization Act of 2018 set up the Mechanical Licensing Collective (MLC) to handle these royalties more efficiently.
These days, digital distributors are very important to the royalty ecosystem. Companies such as TuneCore, CD Baby, and DistroKid act as go-betweens for artists and streaming services, collecting and sending out royalties. Most of the time, these distributors charge a flat fee or take a cut of the royalties.
Streaming Services
For a monthly fee, platforms like Spotify and Apple Music have helped more people find new music, but it has also caused arguments about how much artists should be paid.
Most streaming services use the pro-rata model, which takes all subscription revenue and splits it up based on how many times each track has been played. Say that one artist's songs are played 1% of the time on a platform. That artist would get 1% of the total royalty pool.
Some people have said that this system unfairly rewards more well-known artists and may not give enough credit to less popular genres. In 2023, Spotify said it paid out an average of $0.003 to $0.005 per stream. However, rates can change a lot depending on things like subscription level and where the listener is located.
Technological Innovations
Blockchain technology is becoming more visible as a possible way to improve tracking and openness of royalties. Blockchain could make it easier to figure out who owns and uses music by making an unchangeable record of that information. Companies like Blokur and Mediachain are the first to use blockchain to manage music rights.
As an alternative to the pro-rata system, user-centered payment models are being looked into.
With this method, royalties would be given out based on how often each person listens instead of how much the platform is used overall.
Deezer has been testing this kind of model, which could help niche artists and genres by making payouts more directly related to how engaged fans are.
The switch to digital has given people access to music like never before and given artists new ways to make money. But it has also made managing rights more difficult and brought up questions about fair compensation.
As technology changes, the music business must also change to make sure that royalties are paid out fairly and clearly in the digital age.
Current State of Royalties
At the moment, music royalties are complicated, it's hard to get fair pay, and new opportunities are opening up. The digital age has made it more difficult than ever to distribute royalties. The main way people listen to music these days is through streaming services, but as we’ve mentioned, their royalty models are often unclear and controversial.
For example, the system Spotify uses is said to be a model that unfairly supports well-known artists over niche musical groups and new artists.
Transparency is still a big problem. A lot of artists have trouble understanding their royalty statements because the math is so complicated and there are so many middle-men. The Future of Music Coalition did a survey in 2015 and found that 55% of people had trouble understanding their royalty statements.
Another very important issue is fair pay. The switch from physical sales to streaming has had a huge impact on artists' ways of making money. Streaming has made music easier to find, but it has also caused many artists to make less money per unit.
This difference is especially clear for mid-level and new artists, who might not have the huge number of streams they need to make a good living.
Different platforms and regions have very different royalty rates, which makes things hard for artists and people who own the rights to their work. As an example, Apple Music usually pays more per stream than Spotify. Also, rates in new markets are usually lower than rates in old markets.
In the music business, there are a lot of legal battles over royalties. Usually, these happen because contracts aren't clear, people don't agree on who owns the rights, or someone says they weren't paid enough. It has never been more important to have clear, complete contracts and good rights management.
In the US, the Music Modernization Act of 2018 set up the Mechanical Licensing Collective (MLC) to handle mechanical royalties for digital services. This was meant to help with some of these problems. Still, it's not easy to make sure that all the rightful owners get their money.
There are also emerging trends. Artists are finding new ways to make money thanks to new technologies. Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) platforms are making music experiences more immersive, which could lead to new ways of charging for music. For example, virtual concerts in games like Fortnite have shown that they can bring in a lot of money.
There are also more and more chances to license music in the gaming industry. More and more people are playing music-based games, custom soundtracks, and in-game music. This opens up new ways to make royalties.
Direct-to-consumer (D2C) models are becoming more popular. These models let artists skip traditional middlemen and keep more of their earnings. Bandcamp and other sites that let artists sell music and other items directly to fans have shown promise. Bandcamp said in 2023 that fans had paid artists $1 billion through their service since it began.
Because they give artists more control over pricing and distribution, these direct-to-consumer models could have a big effect on royalty structures. They also give useful information about how engaged fans are, which can be used to improve marketing and tour planning.
Conclusion
Yes, the music royalty system was very different back then from what it is today. These new ideas open up exciting possibilities, but they also bring new problems.
As the music business adjusts to these changes, it will be very important for artists, labels, tech companies, and policymakers to work together to create a fair and sustainable royalty system.
Royalty Exchange has become a major player in this changing landscape by providing a one-of-a-kind platform that brings together people who make music and investors who want to buy music royalties. This market lets artists turn their future royalty streams into cash, giving them instant cash and giving investors a chance to get involved in the music industry's financial system creating a source of passive income generation for interested investors. The model used by Royalty Exchange is a new way to finance music that could give artists, producers, and songwriters more freedom and control over their financial futures.
Take this catalog featuring songs by Eminem for instance. The investor acquired this catalog for $26,000 and collected $7,178 in royalties over 10 months, achieving an impressive ROI of 81.50% after they sold it to another buyer on the platform for $43,478.
We’ve prepared this guide on Royalty Investing Made Easy to help you get started with investing in music royalty catalogs. This is the best guide for understanding why music royalties are one of the best passive income ideas of 2024. Learn everything there is to know about the complexities of song royalties, investing in royalties, and how to buy the rights to a song. Sign up now to begin your journey into music royalty investing. Discover why so many investors today are using Royalty Exchange to buy royalties to expand and diversify their portfolio. Get your hands on your favorite music catalog today!
As the music business continues to adapt to digital challenges, the Royalty Exchange and other platforms may become more important in how creators and investors value, trade, and use music royalties.
